Frist, Santorum, and the Naked Power Grab

From the diaries--Chris

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's public relations offensive of yesterday, against the filibuster, is yet another maneuver to turn his Party's narrow electoral majorities of the 2004 election into a mandate for unlimited political control over all branches of our government.  Frist, Santorum, and company want unchecked legislative power so they can weaken the judiciary as a check on their absolute power.

The "nuclear option" is a radical effort by Republican Senate leaders hell-bent on consolidating all power at the expense of Democrats, majority opinion, minority rights, and our carefully crafted constitutional system of checks and balances.

Of more immediate consequence, right-wing Senators like Rick Santorum and Bill Frist want to guarantee the confirmation of anti-constitutional judges to our federal courts and, above all, to our Supreme Court.

Today, radical Republicans want monopoly power to influence the judiciary.  If Democrats were to yield in the face of this latest Republican power-grab, where will it lead?  To new and renewed limits on civil liberties?  To the termination of a women's constitutionally-guaranteed right to reproductive freedom?  To even more destructive budget deficits designed to undermine our government's capacity to do good?  To even more reckless foreign policy spending that addresses each and every global problem with a military response?  To permanent tax breaks for elitist campaign contributors and out-sourcing corporate cronies?

Destructive as the radical right's current agenda is, now imagine what tomorrow could bring if Democrats allow Republican consolidation of all power... Given Republican failures to safeguard our ports, chemical plants, waterways, and more, what happens when another terrorist attack occurs on American soil?  What further erosions may we anticipate for the U.S. Constitution?  Does our democracy give way entirely to a plutocracy, a theocracy, or another form of authoritarian rule?  Do we suspend elections in the name of "defending democracy"?  

As an historian, I consider the above scenario no reach at all when reflecting on modern times.  Given the fact that the last few centuries of Western history are littered with war-torn and bloody conflicts, one thought is never far from my mind: "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely."  

Within the American context, most of our descendents have been spared the worst outcomes with regard to executive, legislative, and/or judicial abuses of power.  Or, at least that is the case in the over the last fifty years or so.  Nevertheless, we must never forget the horrific consequences of unchecked power for Native-Americans (Trail of Tears), African-Americans (slavery and Jim Crow), Japanese-Americans (suspended rights and concentration camps), women (reproductive rights), workers (right to organize and collective bargaining), children (workplace abuses), and consumers (food, water, land), among others.

President Andrew Jackson defied the Supreme Court in driving American Indians from the Southeastern United States in the early nineteenth century; only a generation ago did black Americans overcame some 350 years of unchecked repression at all levels of government; our panic-stricken society's political leaders (Gov. Warren and Pres. Roosevelt) caved to public opinion in systematically denying due process to Americans of Japanese descents in World War II; a woman's right to safe and legal abortion rights (Roe v. Wade, 1973) arrived after generations of fighting for equal gender rights; until FDR signed the Wagner Act (National Labor Relations Board) of 1935, American workers struggled mightily to achieve organizing and collective bargaining rights against an unchecked corporate-government collusion; children's and consumer's rights against corporate-government power were adopted during the early twentieth century Progressive Era, when citizens of good conscience protested for action at the local, state, and national levels of government.

It's vitally important to remind ourselves how far we have come and how much is at stake in the power struggles now unfolding in Washington, D.C., and elsewhere in our great land.  

Rick Santorum and Bill Frist are the leaders of a dangerous attempt by far right ideologues to expand their power and impose their narrow religious-economic world view on all Americans.

The grassroots has done its part in defending the filibuster and minority rights, and overwhelming majority opinion.  We have attended rallies sponsored by MoveOn, written letters to the editor, and contacted more moderate and reasonable Republican Senators--Specter, McCain, Chaffee, Collins, Hagel, Lugar, Snowe, and Warner--to join with Senate Democrats and Independent Jim Jeffords in order to defend the checks and balances system that upholds the rights and liberties that Americans have struggled to achieve and preserve over the last 230 years.

Yours in solidarity,

Chuck Pennacchio

http://www.chuck2006.com



Display:


NT: 06 Senate Campaign (none / 0)

What are we to make of Joe Hoeffel's endorsement of Bob Casey so early on in this election season?  Is ther a role for progressive Dems in PA?
by MD in MA on Fri Apr 29, 2005 at 01:48:58 PM EST

Why do Gov. Rendell and Hoeffel prefer Casey? (3.00 / 0)

Do they hate the Democratic party?
by Gary Boatwright on Fri Apr 29, 2005 at 03:23:31 PM EST

No, just like winning. (none / 0)


by nickshepDEM on Fri Apr 29, 2005 at 07:02:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Just like the Kerry Primary voters n/t (3.00 / 0)


by PennStateDem on Fri Apr 29, 2005 at 08:53:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm just asking (none / 0)

Why is the Democratic party fighting so hard to keep the only Democrats who have a clue how to be an opposition party out of the primaries?

Have Joe Biden and Joe Lieberman accomplished more for President Bush than they have for their own party?

Is the voting record of any of the Blue Dog Democrats any better than Zell Miller's was?

Not counting Joe Biden and Joe Lieberman, if Karl Rove had to pick the perfect Democrat, how many Blue Dog Democrats would he have to choose from?

Why is John Kerry co-sponsoring the Pharmacists Right to Discriminate Against Women Act with Rick Santorum?

Why do so many Democrats hate the Democratic party?

by Gary Boatwright on Fri Apr 29, 2005 at 03:46:29 PM EST

Re: I'm just asking (none / 0)

Think it might have something to do with going after the CattLick vote?
by rodean on Sat Apr 30, 2005 at 07:16:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Gov. Rendell - old school Democrat (3.00 / 1)

Old school = prefers the moribund party structures we have now, as opposed to a revitalized party with fresh energy.

That's why he is so careful to stage manage the primary, instead of promoting a vigorous primary season that captures attention and increases the base.

For shame.... First ABB - and losing, next ABS - and losing again.

by clenchner on Fri Apr 29, 2005 at 04:21:13 PM EST

Interesting Note (none / 0)

Rendell, in the April 14 Allentown Morning Call, in response to a flap about appearing at a fundraiser for a Bethlehem mayoral candidate, was quoted as saying that he, as a rule, does not endorse in Democratic primaries, and proceeded to assist other candidates in that race with fundraising.

Hmm...  

by PennStateDem on Fri Apr 29, 2005 at 05:42:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Why Do the Democrats Keep Losing Elections (none / 0)

They only pick insiders blessed by consultants, regardless of their lack of a message or voter appeal.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result....Albert Einstein

by jd2 on Fri Apr 29, 2005 at 05:41:42 PM EST

No one ever stabs you in the back in the Senate (none / 0)

Pennacio is right; however, like
the schiavo case - we are still talking
about things that, if Santorum were
guiding the debate - would be front and
center.

I am told that the nuclear option has
died a natural death.. just like terri.

One thing is certain: whoever is still standing
up for it will certainly remain radioactive
if it's killed off.
Good luck.

by turnerbroadcasting on Sun May 01, 2005 at 01:56:08 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.